W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: "suboptions" of Option 7

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:06:07 -0400
Cc: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
Message-Id: <51890C32-1BEC-470C-A3BD-3F489BCEC460@evilfunhouse.com>
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:38 AM, Alexandre Passant wrote:

> While I'm really willing to see RDFa annotated endpoints, I think  
> that 2 issues in that case would be:
> - Some endpoints do not provide any forms for query input (unless we  
> want to say in the next spec that any endpoint must have a form for  
> query input - I'd favor that as well)

I'm not sure having a service description in HTML and/or RDFa implies  
that the HTML *has* to have a query form. It might be nice, but the  
spec might not have to force the query form on everybody (and in fact  
not doing so might help us re: abuse of conneg, allowing the people  
who are going to add a query form to be the ones who are abusing  
conneg, not the spec).

.greg
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:06:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT