W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Options on SPARQL endpoint descriptions...

From: Greg Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:06:31 -0700
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090811230631.GE3331@realify.com>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:01:00PM +0100, Axel Polleres said:
> 
> If we rule out Option 5 entirely, we have no defined way of querying the 
> service description directly over the very SPARQL endpoint, do we want 
> that? I feel somehow this could be useful, but don't really have a 
> strong opinion about it either. We could recommend some variant of 
> Option 5 on top of one of the others informally and simply not enforce 
> everybody to support it?

Doesn't option 7 (conneg) give you this for free? By using the service
URI in a FROM clause, the service description RDF could be pulled in by
the endpoint (assuming it didn't keep it loaded) and be queried.

.greg
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 23:17:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT