On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Kendall Clark<kendall@clarkparsia.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org> wrote: >>> Hopefully, the inclusion of the REST-style interface will go >>> some way to mollifying those people you're referring to. >> >> No, my point is that Option 2 will *not* be seen as REST-style by some people. > > But that's the point. This is to allow for SPARQL/Update interface to > have an HTTP binding. This is *not* a REST interface - intentionally > so. Ah, yes, then forgive me for misunderstanding. Cheers, KendallReceived on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:36:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:14 GMT