W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: [ISSUE-32] Implications of updates on protocol, regarding HTTP methods

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:13:59 -0500
Message-ID: <a25ac1f0907291213o4f4cad97t3ae9978dff83655a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Kendall Clark<kendall@clarkparsia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Paul Gearon<gearon@ieee.org> wrote:
>>  Hopefully, the inclusion of the REST-style interface will go
>> some way to mollifying those people you're referring to.
> No, my point is that Option 2 will *not* be seen as REST-style by some people.

But that's the point. This is to allow for SPARQL/Update interface to
have an HTTP binding. This is *not* a REST interface - intentionally

That said, we *also* want a REST interface, and it will need to
coexist without interference. Those people who want to look at
everything in REST should be able to ignore the Update-interface
binding, and vice versa. Of course, some people will object anyway,
but committee processes are about compromise.

Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:14:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:57 UTC