- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:45:29 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 25, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > I think this is pretty cool, myself, but it also seems very new, a > very high burden for implementors, and potentially fraught with > security concerns that I haven't thought of yet. > > I'd like to know if there are any other implementations of this > feature (which, to generalize a bit, I'd call a mechanism for > interoperably resolving unknown SPARQL functions) and also if there > are any Working Group members who care to advocate in favor of the > group producing a specification for this feature. I did one of the first implementations of this and presented it at the scripting for semantic web workshop in 2007[1]. The code may have suffered from bit rot at this point (getting the JS interpreter installed and linked to my code was non-trivial and maintaining it took a back seat to other issues). I still really like the idea, but agree with most of what's already been said regarding it being well beyond a 1.1 feature and difficult to spec properly. .greg [1] http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-248/paper7.pdf
Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 16:46:08 UTC