Re: Naming - old and new SPARQL from Steve Harris on 2009-03-25 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2009)

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:35:18 +0000
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <B2F52B55-C15F-4C79-AA1D-385ADA837DAA@garlik.com>

On 25 Mar 2009, at 15:28, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
> possibilities?

> SPARQL 1.0 -> SPARQL 1.1

That would be my favourite.

Putting a year in there is just asking for publication dates like the  
47th of December :)

I agree with Andy about the negative connotations of SPARQL 2.

- Steve

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 21:35:58 UTC