On 25 Mar 2009, at 15:28, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > possibilities? > SPARQL 1.0 -> SPARQL 1.1 That would be my favourite. Putting a year in there is just asking for publication dates like the 47th of December :) I agree with Andy about the negative connotations of SPARQL 2. - SteveReceived on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 21:35:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:11 GMT