RE: Naming - old and new SPARQL

A big NO to "SPARQL 2" from me.

Major version numbers imply (to me) incompatible or significantly large change.

	Andy

PS Maybe SPARQL 2010 should have had a ":-)"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
> Sent: 25 March 2009 15:29
> To: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Naming - old and new SPARQL
> 
> I'd like to solicit suggestions for what to call SPARQL circa 2008 and
> the new work that we are doing, as per Andy's latest email.
> 
> possibilities?
> 
> SPARQL 1 -> SPARQL 2
> SPARQL 1.0 -> SPARQL 1.1
> SPARQL 2008 -> SPARQL 2010
> 
> Lee