W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2009

RE: Naming - old and new SPARQL

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:54 +0000
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3628D9A7238@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
A big NO to "SPARQL 2" from me.

Major version numbers imply (to me) incompatible or significantly large change.

	Andy

PS Maybe SPARQL 2010 should have had a ":-)"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
> Sent: 25 March 2009 15:29
> To: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Naming - old and new SPARQL
> 
> I'd like to solicit suggestions for what to call SPARQL circa 2008 and
> the new work that we are doing, as per Andy's latest email.
> 
> possibilities?
> 
> SPARQL 1 -> SPARQL 2
> SPARQL 1.0 -> SPARQL 1.1
> SPARQL 2008 -> SPARQL 2010
> 
> Lee

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 15:58:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT