W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Next telecon features & beyond

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:00:36 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C95E927D-D754-4D20-A689-BD0611F0D1EA@deri.org>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Hi,

Le 12 mars 09 à 06:49, Lee Feigenbaum a écrit :

> Next week I'd like to continue where we left off, with brief  
> discussions of some of the more "major" suggested features that  
> impact the query language itself. These include:
>
> Assignment
> Property paths - Andy
> Aggregates
> Negation
> Update
> Basic Federated Query
> Parameterized inference/control of inference

I thinks that Path Length [1] may also be included in that list, as a  
major feature.

As it strongly relates to property path: Andy, OpenLink, any objection  
to merge the two features in a single page ?
(As path length does not makes any sense without the path itself, it's  
obvious for the inclusion in that direction, but I want to be sure  
both of you agree on adding another feature (lenght) to your path  
initial proposal.)

Best,

Alex.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:PathLength

>
>
> Could we get volunteers to briefly present these?
>
> (I don't actually think we'll get to all of these on the  
> teleconference.)
>
> Subsequent weeks I'd like to roughly divide like this (this is  
> unordered):
>
> * Other query language suggestions (syntax, new functions, bnode  
> refs, limit by resource, one of, pragmas, CONSTRUCT enhancements)
> * Protocol extensions (parameters, cost models, cursors, query by  
> reference, return format)
> * Rest of SPARQL landscape (RDF or XML syntax for queries, service  
> description, query response linking, ...)
>
> I know that Bijan, at least, is also interested in proposing  
> something regarding OWL semantics, but I'm not sure what shape that  
> will be so I'm not sure where to put it. :-)
>
> As I said on the teleconference, there's _no way_ we'll discuss all  
> of these on the teleconferences. I'd like to re-ask that people take  
> time to read the wiki and to discuss over email as much as possible.  
> When we have some discussion going, we may also have the opportunity  
> to set up supplemental calls to discuss specific topics during the  
> next month.
>
> Comments, questions always welcome.
>
> Lee
>
>

-- 
Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Friday, 13 March 2009 18:01:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT