Re: Potential text for time-permitting features in F&R

On 6/25/09 9:23 AM, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Ie, I would rather say:
> 
> [[[
> [...] Time-permitting, the SPARQL WG will use the existing framework to
> define the semantics of SPARQL queries for one or more of these
> entailment frameworks:
> + OWL 2 with both Direct and RDF Based Semantics, including OWL 2 profiles
> + RDF Schema
> + RIF rule sets
> ]]]
> 
> Another issue I have is with RIF Rule sets, (I would leave Axel to say
> that): I would have thought that only RIF Core and RIF BLD dialects are
> really o.k. with SPARQL. I do not believe that RIF PLD would be a
> reasonable candidate...

Certainly not RIF PLD, and perhaps RIF Core alone.

----------------------
Chimezie Thomas-Ogbuji (oh-bu-gee)
Heart and Vascular Institute (Clinical Investigations)
Cleveland Clinic (ogbujic@ccf.org)
Ph.D. Student Case Western Reserve University
(chimezie.thomas-ogbuji@case.edu)


===================================

P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top hospitals
in America by U.S. News & World Report (2008).  
Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for
a complete listing of our services, staff and
locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 14:25:07 UTC