W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Review of F&R doc

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:24:55 +0100
Message-Id: <4987A34C-9429-4D05-9FDD-BEE284808DCD@garlik.com>
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Sorry, a bit last minute, but here it is:

2.3.1 Motivations

Perhaps it should say something like "Negation by failure is possible  
in many cases"? I'm not sure that anyone has shown that it can be done  
in all cases.

2.3.3 Existing implementation

Missing closing parenthesis in ARQ description.

2.4: Project expressions

More mention should be made of subqueries, as the two can be used  
together to answer many usecases.

2.4.3 Existing implementation

Example uses a CONSTRUCT expression, which is not necessarily the same  
kind of thing as a Projected Expression.
I don't feel that this example adds anything other the subselect form.  
Both are required features, so it's fine (in-fact desirable) to  
combine them IMHO.

4.1.1 Motivations

Should mention bNodes/roundtripping perhaps? There's no stable and  
standard way to refer to exported bNodes once they leave the SPARQL  

4.2.3 Existing implementation

Garlik's JXT supports HTTP PUT and DELETE.

- Steve

Steve Harris
Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK
+44(0)20 8973 2465  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10  
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 10:25:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:56 UTC