- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:24:16 +0200
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Steve Harris wrote: > On 10 Jun 2009, at 10:46, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > I broadly agree with Andy, but for > >> Structure: >> Currently it is: >> ---- >> # 4 SPARQL/Update 1.0 >> >> * 4.1 Update >> >> # 5 Protocol Enhancements >> >> * 5.1 HTTP graph update > > I think it's correct as it is. SPARQL/Update is part of a language, and > the protocol is something else. for the moment, I suggest we leave is as is and put in as an issue for discussion... would something like the following refplect the intentions correctly? "HTTP based graph update via the protocol is orthogonal to the SPARQL/Update language mentioned above. Whether or not there will be a concrete mapping between SPARQL/Update and HTTP based graph update is currently under discussion in the working group." I agree that Protocol enhancements could have more things, which aren't related to update alone. Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 08:24:55 UTC