W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Some comments on F&R (2)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:24:16 +0200
Message-ID: <4A30BF30.5050600@deri.org>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Steve Harris wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2009, at 10:46, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> I broadly agree with Andy, but for
> 
>> Structure:
>> Currently it is:
>> ----
>> #  4 SPARQL/Update 1.0
>>
>>    * 4.1 Update
>>
>> # 5 Protocol Enhancements
>>
>>    * 5.1 HTTP graph update
> 
> I think it's correct as it is. SPARQL/Update is part of a language, and 
> the protocol is something else.

for the moment, I suggest we leave is as is and  put in as an issue for 
discussion... would something like the following refplect the intentions 
correctly?

"HTTP based graph update via the protocol is orthogonal to the 
SPARQL/Update language mentioned above. Whether or not there will be a 
concrete mapping between SPARQL/Update and HTTP based graph update is 
currently under discussion in the working group."

I agree that Protocol enhancements could have more things, which aren't 
related to update alone.

Axel

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 08:24:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:39 GMT