- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:04:31 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum > Sent: 26 May 2009 01:25 > To: SPARQL Working Group > Subject: Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates) > > This email discharges my action > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/23 in reference to this > issue: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/11. > ... > > Based on the balance of current implementation experience and based on > the SQL precedent, I'm going to suggest that we resolve ISSUE-11 in > favor of explicit grouping and in favor of it being an error to project > variables (or scalar functions on variables) not mentioned in GROUP BY. > > Of course, I'll be happy to entertain suggestions to the contrary. I agree. Andy > > Lee >
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 12:06:01 UTC