W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates)

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:04:31 +0000
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA3646C2E07A6@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Lee Feigenbaum
> Sent: 26 May 2009 01:25
> To: SPARQL Working Group
> Subject: Implicit vs. Explicit Grouping (Aggregates)
> 
> This email discharges my action
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/23 in reference to this
> issue: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/11.

> 
...

> 
> Based on the balance of current implementation experience and based on
> the SQL precedent, I'm going to suggest that we resolve ISSUE-11 in
> favor of explicit grouping and in favor of it being an error to project
> variables (or scalar functions on variables) not mentioned in GROUP BY.
> 
> Of course, I'll be happy to entertain suggestions to the contrary.

I agree.

	Andy

> 
> Lee
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 12:06:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT