- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:23:22 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6 May 2009, at 18:14, Bijan Parsia wrote: [snip -- yay fat-fingering] > I'll also note that the answers to these questions that I propose > make specing Simple, RDF, RDFS, D-entailment (all flavors), and all OWL profiles quite easy. These answers are the same for all of them to get a reasonable (and interoperable) entailment regime. Basically, you end up with a set of groundings for any query such that OH! That gives me the 5) 5) What do you do with "out of scope" queries? So, does a query to an OWL DL ontology have to be OWL DL? What happens if it isn't? anyway... You end up with a set of queries (all possible groundings of the query into the legal solutions). The queries that are entailed give you all and only the answers that you must return (for a sound and complete answer). Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 17:19:29 UTC