W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: rdf:text review

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:06:17 +0000
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6CF1054FDC8B845BF93A6645D19BEA362D13287F6@GVW1118EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdf-dawg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Axel Polleres
> Sent: 28 April 2009 09:37
> To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group'
> Subject: rdf:text review
> Dear all,
> I would like to encourage everybody who has comments on it to read
> Andy's rdf:text review, such that we can put it forward to OWL+RIF.
> Unless severe additional new comments or concerns come up, I'd like to
> propose to put it forward "as is" as official review of from the SPARQL
> WG to get the process of fixing the concerns going, ideally after
> today's telecon or at least after the F2F (in case we can't agree
> quickly today, we should have some discussion about it at the f2f).

The text sent should have some proposals for changes to the rdf:text (at least in outline) to address the issues raised because some of these issues have been around for sometime now (Dec 2008).  
The current draft reply has not got that far and certainly not to WG consensus.  See my other message for the beginning of this with areas needing text changes.  

It would be good to have your comments on the material so far as you are an editor of rdf:text so, hopefully, we can reduce the number of cycles needed.


> The resason for pushing this is that rdf:text should ideally enter CR
> with the rest of the OWL documents in June, which is why
> </sparql><rif>we</rif><sparql> want all concerns addressed as soon as
> possible.
> best regards,
> Axel
> --
> Dr. Axel Polleres
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,
> Galway
> email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 09:07:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:56 UTC