W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

SPARQL telecon agenda for Apr 25, 2009 - 90 minutes

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:51:05 -0400
Message-ID: <49F5D469.5040401@thefigtrees.net>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone,

Here's our agenda for tomorrow. Note that I've asked for us to try to 
give 90 minutes tomorrow to best prepare for our face-to-face next week.

Besides discussing the face-to-face, our main goals are to see if we 
have consensus on a few SPARQL features, and also to allow people who 
have been strong proponents of issues that do not seem to have broad 
support to advocate for them once again.

Note that we may be making proposals/resolutions around adopting some 
deliverables tomorrow, so if you will not be attending the 
teleconference and have strong feeling on the (current) top features, 
please let them be known via email.

talk to you all tomorrow,

See: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-04-28

     *  Date of Call: Tuesday April 28, 2009
     * Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 10:00 (East US)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 77277# (SPARQ)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #sparql 
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc 
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 90 minutes
     * Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
     * Scribe: Ivan Mikhailov (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2009-04-28

[edit] Agenda

Note 90 minute duration.

     * Admin
           o PROPOSED: Approve minutes at 
           o Next meeting: 2009-05-05 @ 15:00 BST / 10:00 EDT ? Do we 
skip telecon the day before F2F?
     * Logistics
           o Scribe next time: Chimezie Ogbuji (Scribe List)
     * Liaisons
           o Anything to report?
           o OWL WG (Bijan)
           o HCLS (Eric)
           o XQuery (Eric)
           o RIF WG (Axel)
           o RDB2RDF WG (Orri)
     * Action/issue status - via tracker: 
     * Face-to-face next week
           o Confirm attendees
           o Logistics questions?
                 + Timing
           o Agenda
                 + Suggested agenda:
                       # 0.5 day discussing features
                       # 0.5 day discussing feature 1
                       # 0.5 day discussing feature 2
                       # 0.5 day discussing feature 3
                 + Suggested discussion points:
                       # Naming (SPARQL 1.1 vs. SPARQL 2 vs. ???)
                       # Survey of existing designs
                       # Straw man designs
                       # Test cases
     * Feature Survey http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/features/
           o Survey open until Friday, May 1
           o Current results are at 
           o See Condorcet results from SteveH at 
           o Can we reach consensus on a few features? Current 
front-runners per Condorcet are:
                 + Aggreagtes
                 + Subselects
                 + Update
           o Discussion around features with strong advocacy that seem 
"at risk"
                 + SPARQL/OWL (Bijan)
                 + LimitPerResource (Kjetil, Alex)
                 + ParameterizedInference (Chime)
                 + AccessingRdfLists (EricP)
                 + SPARQLX (Bijan)
                 + Others?

[edit] Regrets

     * Orri Erling
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 15:51:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:56 UTC