- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:57:20 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Thursday 16 April 2009 23:08:03 Steve Harris wrote: > Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. Well, it depends whether the ranking > method, doesn't it? If we use something like Condorcet then there's no > problem with people voting for as many as they care to, if I remember > correctly. Yeah, that's my understanding too. Condorcet looks nice to me, as it produces a ranked list, but then I came across something the other day that said the method was created for single-winner ballots, so perhaps there is an even better suited method somewhere that has been explicitly created for ranked list ballots? If we can't find something quickly, Condorcet sounds good to me. Kind regards Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Senior Knowledge Engineer Mobile: +47 986 48 234 Email: kjetil.kjernsmo@computas.com Web: http://www.computas.com/ | SHARE YOUR KNOWLEDGE | Computas AS PO Box 482, N-1327 Lysaker | Phone:+47 6783 1000 | Fax:+47 6783 1001
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 14:58:00 UTC