W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [limit per resource] implementation experience and/or concerns?

From: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:00:38 +0200
Message-ID: <49E83726.3080905@uni-koblenz.de>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lee Feigenbaum schrieb:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:LimitPerResource

> 1/ does anyone implement this in SPARQL?

Perhaps Virtuoso and ARQ via subselects?

> 2/ does anyone implement this elsewhere (e.g. in SQL)?

In SQL, this should be possible using subselects, but there is no
special syntax AFAIC.

> 3/ on the surface, are there any implementation, specification, or other
> concerns about this feature?

I think this is a good example for a feature, which might be complicated
when addressed on its own, but which basically comes for free, when
combined with another one (subselects).

Best regards,
Simon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknoNyEACgkQQ0Lz1fXAQeOPDACgkZurS9BhLPZj7PY5CZ6aHKeb
/TwAnR7K6BhLm2OSYrgx/+pG+dDgGbey
=hroP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 17 April 2009 08:01:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:38 GMT