W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2007

DAWG Agenda - 23 Oct 2007 @ 14:30 UTC - To PR?

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:18:09 -0400
Message-ID: <471C40A1.6030400@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Hi everyone,

Please attend this Tuesday's DAWG teleconference if you can, as we'll be
going over the PR transition request materials and making a final
decision regarding transitioning to PR.

Lee


0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 23 October 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
          + LeeF chairing
          + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200
tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
          + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
          + Scribe: @@
          + Regrets:
          + roll call
          + minutes from last week [2]
          + Next meeting is 30 Oct 2007 @@ recruit scribe, regrets?
          + agenda comments?


1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: LeeF to investigate PR mechanics, put together draft transition
request
ACTION: Chimezie to review reworked text for 12.2.1 Converting Graph
Patterns and send comments by end of day Wednesday

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: EricP to draft documents into /2007/SPARQL with namespace
changes etc. for review next week
ACTION: EricP to review reworked text for 12.2.1 Converting Graph
Patterns and send comments by end of day Wednesday

2. Review spec bytes

Any oustanding changes from the editors?


3. Review PR transition request and associated materials

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/prq819


4. To PR?

The results of the Web survey are here:

   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/prq337/results

(Note that OpenLink Software also registered a "yes" via proxy to me; I
don't seem to have the rights to enter
it on the survey though.)

There have been a few more bytes changed since the survey, so I'd like a
WG decision to request transition to PR, based on the results of the
survey and changes since then.


9. SPARQL Testimonials

I sent a message to the list about testimonials (no URL from the archive
yet). Let's talk about that a bit.



[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/att-0048/16-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 06:18:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT