W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2007

Survey: Should the SPARQL specifications transition to PR?

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:02:37 -0400
Message-ID: <470C40CD.6080200@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

As promised on today's telecon, we've setup a Web survey to gather the 
Working Group's desire regarding requesting a transition of the three 
SPARQL specifications (query language, protocol, and query results XML 
format) to Proposed Recommendation.

The Web Survey is at:

   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/prq337/

Also note that the question as put in the survey is contingent on the 
group's approval (at next Tuesday's telecon) of the wording changes that 
derived from today's teleconference:

ACTION: AndyS to draft text recognizing the ambiguity  ({{ ... }} vs { 
... } )

ACTION: Chimezie to propose text to clarify that not all graphs in the 
dataset need to be disjoint/distinct

Despite the later deadline in the survey, please respond to the survey 
*before the start of our Oct 16 telecon*.

thanks,
Lee
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 03:02:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT