Survey: Should the SPARQL specifications transition to PR?

As promised on today's telecon, we've setup a Web survey to gather the 
Working Group's desire regarding requesting a transition of the three 
SPARQL specifications (query language, protocol, and query results XML 
format) to Proposed Recommendation.

The Web Survey is at:

   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/prq337/

Also note that the question as put in the survey is contingent on the 
group's approval (at next Tuesday's telecon) of the wording changes that 
derived from today's teleconference:

ACTION: AndyS to draft text recognizing the ambiguity  ({{ ... }} vs { 
... } )

ACTION: Chimezie to propose text to clarify that not all graphs in the 
dataset need to be disjoint/distinct

Despite the later deadline in the survey, please respond to the survey 
*before the start of our Oct 16 telecon*.

thanks,
Lee