W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2007

An early notice that this week's agenda will be late (contains content!)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:53:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4709A9B0.8080007@thefigtrees.net>
To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Here's the basic schedule from here to PR:

+ telecon this week to decide remaining QL issues and approve text
+ WBS for a week from this Tuesday to decide if we are ready to request PR
+ finish disposition of comments and implementation reports for all 
three specs
+ review DoCs and impl reports on the Oct 16 telecon
+ submit request for transition to PR
+ publish

Looking back at the list of what needs to be done, here's where I think 
we stand:


Query Language:

(1) Implementation report

Needs:
   + DONE to use the conservative algorithm (EricP)
   + NOT NEEDED NOW to have a stricter mapping from facets to tests 
(LeeF, but needs info from EricP on where to adjust this mapping)
   + to have green boxes from two implementations for each feature (will 
probably have if new dataset/ and graph/ tests get approved as per 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007OctDec/0012.html )
   + support for syntax tests (EricP)
   + some indication of multiple implementations of REDUCED (EricP, 
AndyS?, SteveH?)

(2) Disposition of Comments

Needs:
   + to be assembled (LeeF) - draft at 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/doc-ql-cr
   + DONE any outstanding comments to be addressed - no outstanding 
comments currently


(3) Spec

Needs:
   + resolution of the {{ ... }} optional+filter issue (LeeF, 
implementors, working group) - LeeF will summarize, decision at 9 Oct 
Telecon
   + examination of 7 tests in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0177.html 
to see if implementations are broken by the fix to the bug in the spec 
(assigned to LeeF in the meeting, but perhaps Chimezie can do this?)


Protocol:

(1) Implementation report

Needs:
   + DONE to successfully run the protocol tests against multiple HTTP 
endpoints (EliasT)
   + DONE to put together a format for the implementation report (LeeF) 
- initial draft at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/impl-report-protocol
   + to figure out how to represent the SOAP testing in the 
implementation report (AndyS)

(2) Disposition of Comments

Needs:
   + to be put together (LeeF) - initial draft at 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/doc-protocol-cr
   + to address remaining comments (LeeF) - I've emailed Jonathan Marsh 
vis a vis his quite old comment about schemaLocation which didn't seem 
to apply to our CR published WSDL. No response yet.


Results format:

(1) Implementation report

Needs:
   + to have a format akin to the impl report for the protocol (LeeF)
   + to take results from Andy's XSLT (consumer), Eric's software 
(consumer), Elias's python (consumer) in conjunction with the results 
from the protocol testing (producers) to demonstrate interop (EliasT, 
LeeF) - This has changed a bit - we're going to piggyback on Elias's 
HTTP protocol testing stuff, so this is waiting on (EliasT)

(2) Disposition of Comments

No comments have (yet) been received since our recent CR publication. 
Draft "report" at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/doc-xml-cr


Other - registration of MIME types (IETF, EricP) - probably not going to 
happen in time.


Lee
Received on Monday, 8 October 2007 03:53:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT