W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: test changes and additions

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:41:46 +0100
Message-ID: <46BA2A8A.9010504@hp.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> expr-builtin/q-iri-1.rq and expr-builtin/q-uri-1.rq are both identical: 
> both use isUri. I've changed q-iri-1.rq to use isIri instead. I'll 
> propose re-approving this test with the 1-byte change next Tuesday.

ARQ passes this test :-)

> 
> basic/manifest#prefix-name-1 tests proper handling of prefixes without a 
> local name. Glitter passes it.

ARQ passes this test

> 
> expr-ops/manifest.ttl is a new manifest containing 7 tests of simple 
> numeric ops (<=, >=, +, -, *) that didn't seem to be covered elsewhere. 
> Glitter passes all 7.

ARQ does not pass these tests because the data is not legal Turtle.

":x2 :p 2."

In Turtle, "2." is a decimal, and not an integer followed by a dot.  Turtle 
and SPARQL agree on this point.

http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle/
[16] decimal ::= ('-' | '+')? ( [0-9]+ '.' [0-9]* | '.' ([0-9])+ | ([0-9])+ )

and "2." matches "[0-9]+ '.' [0-9]*"

(OK - there is a small Turtle bug that it also matches ([0-9])+ which is the 
same as integer rule [15]

I fixed the data and then ARQ passes these tests.  i took the liberty of 
checking the change into CVS.

[[
Aside: It is legal N3.
I only know this since I collected some notes together only on Monday
http://jena.hpl.hp.com/wiki/Syntax_Comparison_of_N3_and_Turtle#Numbers
]]

	Andy

> 
> I also fixed some facet XPath.
> 
> I regenerated facets-coverage (though not completely up-to-date) which 
> now shows[1] 10 facets uncovered. It should actually be 8.
> 
> Summarizing what remains:
> 
> isLiteral - needs a test
> functions invoked by IRIRef (rather than prefixed name) - needs a test
> cast functions - soliciting tests for these from anyone who has them
> three ORDER BY variants (ordering with expressions, builtins, and 
> functions (e.g. casts)) - needs tests
> reversed order of limit+offset - needs test
> 
> I'll work on these the rest of the week, though happy to take donations 
> of tests from anyone else :-)
> 
> Lee
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/facets-coverage#coverage
> 

-- 
  Hewlett-Packard Limited
  Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
  Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 20:42:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT