W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Tests: OFFSET and LIMIT

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:21:27 +0100
Message-ID: <46A891C7.2050603@hp.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Steve Harris wrote:
> 
> On 25 Jul 2007, at 21:35, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> 
>> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>> Some tests for LIMIT/OFFSET
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/solution-seq/
>>> All the test involve ORDER BY so that the results are consistent.
>> Glitter passes all but slice-4 and slice-5. Upon further  
>> inspection, these tests (maybe others?)

There are no others.

>> rely on sorting xsd:integer  
>> typed literals and plain literals in a consistent manner, which I  
>> think we agreed is undefined by the spec?
> 
> I fail slice-4 & 5 for the same reason.

Fixed in CVS.

By the way - these are draft tests - you can fix them up.

	Andy


> 
> I pass the I18N tests.
> 
> - Steve
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 12:21:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:37 GMT