Re: Tests: OFFSET and LIMIT

• From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
• Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 12:35:43 +0100
• To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <EB3ADC57-C959-45ED-809E-65B27F8191E4@garlik.com>

On 25 Jul 2007, at 21:35, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

>
> Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>> Some tests for LIMIT/OFFSET
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/solution-seq/
>> All the test involve ORDER BY so that the results are consistent.
>
> Glitter passes all but slice-4 and slice-5. Upon further  
> inspection, these tests (maybe others?) rely on sorting xsd:integer  
> typed literals and plain literals in a consistent manner, which I  
> think we agreed is undefined by the spec?

I fail slice-4 & 5 for the same reason.

I pass the I18N tests.

- Steve

Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 11:35:25 UTC