W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2007


From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:49:11 -0400
Message-ID: <469BCBB7.1060108@thefigtrees.net>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
CC: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> Some tests for DISTINCT:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/distinct/
> 10 tests

I pass 8 of the 10 tests.

I fail the two "all" tests: #distinct-9 and #no-distinct-9

Further investigation shows that these tests use multiple qt:data 
relations to build a single default graph, which my test harness doesn't 

Eyeballing the tests looks ok. Do we want to use multiple qt:data 
predicates to build up larger default graphs? (You need to handle 
multiple qt:graphData relationships to pass the tests in .../graph/..., 
but as far as I know this is the only place (so far) that uses multiple 
qt:data predicates. Might be simpler to avoid that.


> But: another spurious 403 has appeared.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/distinct/no-distinct-all.srx 
> while another file (.../distinct-all.srx) in the same add/commit is OK.
>     Andy
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 19:49:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:55 UTC