W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Kendall's review of rq25

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:22:48 +0000
Message-ID: <45E41488.5080905@hp.com>
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org >> RDF Data Access Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Kendall Clark wrote:

> 2. section 12 is completed -- it's not even close as-is (sections 
> 12.2 and 12.3 are simply missing from the doc, even though they're 
> listed in the TOC) -- even more worrisome, there is no connection 
> between 12 and the rest of the doc. Fred Zemke said way back last 
> summer that he didn't see a systematic connection between the grammar 
> and the semantics, and, now, having read this carefully, I completely 
> agree;

I had an editing accident and transferred broken text for sec 12 from the 
working area to rq25 - I only found out at the weekend. CVS helped me dig ou 
the missing text for 12.1 and 12.2 - it was fixed only on Sunday.

My apologies to all reviewers for that.

Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 11:22:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:53 UTC