- From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:54:35 -0500
- To: DAWG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Andy Seaborne wrote on 02/16/2007 10:04:45 AM: > Jeen Broekstra wrote: > > > > I have checked in four additional sets of query evaluation test cases in > > the data-r2 directory: > > > > - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bnode-coreference/ > > (1 test) > > - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bound/ > > (1 test) > > - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/ > > (3 tests) > > - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/expr-builtin/ > > (17 tests) > > > > As far as I have been able to determine, all these tests are up to date > > with the current query spec. Additional eyeballs are invited to correct :) > > expr-builtin/manifest.ttl uses <#dawg-langMatches-1> in the entries list but > the file later has <#dawg-LangMatches-1> (change of case of the "L" of lang). > > Tweaking that, ARQ passes these tests. > My test harness can't handle the five tests in this batch that specify results in .srx (SPARQL XML results) format. Our test README ( http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README.html ) suggests that a test result given in a test manifest "is a resource that refers to an RDF graph." Wihle I can clearly (and easily) convert the .srx format into our RDF test result vocabulary (or even check the results directly from the .srx format), I -- as an implementor -- was surprised to find that some of the test results are given in this format. Perhaps we can either update the README to point this out or update these tests? Also: the manifest.ttl for expr-builtin pointed to the wrong query and results for #dawg-lang-3. I've checked in the fix. I pass all the tests except for the 5 with .srx results, and I've eyeballed those to my satisfaction. Lee
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 13:54:46 UTC