W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Agenda - 20 Feb. 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 18:56:19 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD81BD5E9.D1FAE797-ON85257287.00836794-85257287.00837FEF@us.ibm.com>

Most of our business this week relates to the test suite. We continue to 
progress towards Last Call, and we'll spend a bit of time talking about 
how to get there from where we are now.

Lee

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 20 February, 2007 
at 14:30:00 UTC
         + LeeF chairing
         + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
         + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
         + Scribe: @@ (Elias had volunteered but then sent regrets)
         + Regrets: Souri, EliasT
         + roll call
         + approve 13 Feb minutes [2]
         + next meeting 27 Feb., @@ recruit scribe
         + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These action appear DONE:

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: AndyS to add text clarifying the prohibition on blank node labels 
in multiple BGPs to rq25
ACTION: Elias to add wording for PROPOSED: ed(The SPARLQ Protocol does not 
derefrence query URIs so 5.1.3 does not apply. Per 5.1.4, services must 
define their own base URI, which may be the service invocation URI.)
ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests
ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put 
ACTION: Lee to talk to protocol editors re: POSTing 
application/sparql-query


2. Test suite

Jeen moved some query evaluation tests to the new testing environment...
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0080.html

...and Andy corrected a typo and reports that ARQ passes the tests.
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0081.html

Please try to take a look at these tests in advance so that we can approve 
them.

Eric proposed a syntax test similar to what we approved last week to note 
that OPTIONAL clauses break up BGPs. He also suggested similar tests for 
the GRAPH keyword.
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0079.html

I'd like to also discuss and approve these tests if possible.


3. rq25 status and reviews

We've made more progress on reviews and responses to reviews this week:

  + Souri on placement of '.' in SPARQL queries:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0088.html
  + AndyS incorporates Simon's first batch of feedback:
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0086.html


4. protocol status


The protocol document has not changed much since our previous last calls. 
Does anyone want to do a review of it prior to publishing a LC draft?


5. Road to Last Call

What does our schedule look like from here? Perhaps we can pencil in a 
date on which we hope to make a decision to publish last call drafts?


6. Minimal test suite?

Simon suggested several weeks ago that:

"""
I'm somewhat inclined to have a "designed" collection of tests that are a 
roughly minimal coverage of the features.  Those extra tests reduce the 
chance of a human ever actually reading them, which is highly desirable 
for correctness and understanding.
"""

This was mostly discussed on IRC at the time, and I promised an agenda 
slot to further the discussion last week. I'll keep this around until we 
have a chance to discuss it. In general this is a standing agenda item 
pending time and a good phone connection for Simon.




[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-dawg-minutes
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 23:56:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:36 GMT