- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:38:39 +0000
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote on 02/09/2007 09:04:42 AM: > >> Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> Hi everyone, ... >> (I'd also note that both yield fairly useless URIs in the query as it is > >> unlikely the data has URIs based at service, let alone the query >> request itself.) >> >> YMMV > > I guess MMDV :-) In these cases I was thinking of the utility of relative > IRIs in FROM/FROM NAMED (and GRAPH), rather than in the data itself. True - things like </foo>, <../bar> and <data> might be useful for FROM/FROM NAMED but don't they get to the same place for <http://host/service?query=...> and <http://host/service>? <#ref> might appear in a pattern and it is different for the two choices. Andy
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 14:38:57 UTC