W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Agenda, 23 Jan @ 14:30 UTC

From: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:03:37 -0500
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB4BC2DA7.3F74C65D-ON8525726B.002C1304-8525726B.002C4732@us.ibm.com>

The main feature this week is the syntax tests. Overall, I still think 
we're on schedule to head to last call in early-mid February.

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 23 January, 2007 
at 14:30:00 UTC
         + LeeF chairing
         + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
         + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
         + Scribe: @@
         + Regrets: EliasT, Souri
         + roll call
         + no minutes from 16 Jan yet --  [2] is 403 Forbidden
         + next meeting 30 Jan. Recruit scribe.
         + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These action are DONE:

ACTION: Jeen to do further cosmetic rearranging of SyntaxDev tests and 
then commit them to CVS
ACTION: LeeF to check if SteveH can eyeball Jeen's first group of tests 
pre-WG approval (LeeF and iv_an_ru will also try to eyeball)
ACTION: LeeF to seek early and later reviewers of rq25

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests
ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put 

2. Test suite - syntax tests

Jeen (with follow-ups from LeeF, AndyS, EricP) on syntax tests:

For discussion: some implementations fial at parsing for non-parse errors 
(e.g. unknown function IRIs or relative IRIs with no base)

If possible, please come prepared to discuss approving some or all of the 
syntax tests.

[ed: "Test suite" is a standing agendum; hopefully most weeks we'll have 
some tests that we can look at and approve as a group.]

3. Minimal test suite?

Simon suggested last week that:

I'm somewhat inclined to have a "designed" collection of tests that are a 
roughly minimal coverage of the features.  Those extra tests reduce the 
chance of a human ever actually reading them, which is highly desirable 
for correctness and understanding.

This was mostly discussed on IRC last week, and I promised an agenda slot 
to further the discussion this week.

4. Syntax tests - classification?


I'm not sure I understand how to read this output or what I should be 
looking for in it, so perhaps Eric can explain it to us on the call.

5. rq25 status

We're making good progress on rq25; we have several WG members lined up to 
review the spec. either now or when it's near ready for LC publication. 
EricP wanted to do a once-over last week, as well.

No specific items for this agendum; let's see if there's any blocking 
points on Andy and Eric's work or on any of the reviewers.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2007/01/16-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 22 January 2007 08:04:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:53 UTC