Re: Agenda, 2 Jan @ 14:30 UTC - the New Year's edition

The minutes from December 12 are at 
http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-dawg-minutes . We'll approve them at today's 
meeting. 

Lee

Lee Feigenbaum wrote on 12/29/2006 06:15:44 PM:

> 
> A happy New Year to all DAWGs and DAWG-lovers everywhere.
> 
> Our agenda to kick off 2007, comments are welcome:
> 
> 
> 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 2 January, 2007 
> at 14:30:00 UTC
>                  + LeeF chairing
>                  + comments on the agenda
>          + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>          + SimonR to scribe
>          + Regrets: 
>          + roll call
>          + 12 Dec minutes -- [we'll have a link to approve shortly]
>          + 19 Dec minutes [2]
>          + next meeting 9 Jan. Recruit scribe.
>          + agenda comments?
> 
> 
> 1. Review ACTION Items
> 
> These action are DONE (more on them later):
> 
> ACTION: LeeF to pester PatH about entailment text [recorded in 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/12/19-dawg-minutes.html#action09]
> 
> We'll go through these actions, but I imagine they all CONTINUE: 
> 
> ACTION: SimonR to look at .Unit 
> ACTION: Souri to review 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq24-algebra by 9 Jan 2007 
>   [ed: Souri, would you like Fred's review to discharge your action?]
> ACTION: ericP to seek clarification on 
> 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Nov/0004 
> ACTION: EricP to sort out some string literal thing for the operator 
table 
> [ed: this action is about text for simple literals and xsd:string and 
text 
> for RDFterm-equal] 
> ACTION: KendallC to close formsOfDistinct issue 
> ACTION: KendallC to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be 
put 
> 
> ACTION: PatH to change the entailment section around to talk about 
SPARQL 
> first, then more general conditions in a normative appendix 
> 
> 
> 2. Test suite process
> 
> Classifying tests (EricP)
> 
> Reporting test results (EricP)
> 
> 
> 3. rq24 algebra
> 
> FredZ's review of rq24-algebra:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0213.html
> 
> Can we find a volunteer to write text for an example of applying the 
> specification to an actual query pattern?
> 
> 
> 4. Status of blank node / cardinality issue
> 
> We approved this test case:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#rdfsemantics-bnode-type-var
> 
> ...at the end of November. Is this spec. text that needs to get added 
> within PatH's entailment text?
> 
> (The chair does not want to see this issue get forgotten; I suspect 
there 
> is not much actual discussion needed on this agendum.)
> 
> 
> 5. Issue: punctuationSyntax
> 
> or: should we have commas in the SELECT list and/or ORDER BY list?
> 
> Consensus appeared to begin to emerge in this thread:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0077.html
> 
> The chair would like to put this to the question on 2-Jan, and at the 
> latest on 9-Jan.
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/12/19-dawg-minutes
> [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
> [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
> 
> 
> Lee
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 05:34:42 UTC