RDF Data Access Working Group telecon

bootup()

 

<kendallclark> Propose to accept minutes of telecon on Oct 31: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0130.html

Seconded: elias

Resolved: to accept the minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0130.html

Next meeting: 21 Nov@ 14:30 UTC

Scribe next time: EliasT

action items

<scribe> ACTION: PatH to draft replacement vanilla entailment section for WG consideration [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-dawg-minutes.html#action01]

<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to close formsOfDistinct issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-dawg-minutes.html#action02]

<scribe> CONTINUES

<scribe> ACTION: PatH to review the proposed tests in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0169 and say yay or nay [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-dawg-minutes.html#action03]

<scribe> CONTINUES

<scribe> ACTION: KendallC to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put to the question (re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006OctDec/0099.html ) [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-dawg-minutes.html#action04]

<scribe> ACTION: PatH to draft replacement vanilla entailment section for WG consideration [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/14-dawg-minutes.html#action05]

conf reports

ISWC update: flaoted idea of possible BGP matcher external to spec for entailment regimes other than simple entailment

"SPARQL-DL": 90% of OWL-ED interested in that. DL-community would extend SPARQL themselves.

kendall: good outcome for DAWG
... means current spec just needs to leave the door open but not solve extension

AndyS: hopes to have a separate doc for SPARQL algebra with the new content for rq24 by Dec 1.

AndyS: cardinality of bnodes in BGP : might be able to make a free choice on counting/non-counting for bnodes. May make it easier to implement if act as hidden varaiables.

discussion on scoping set + GRAPH

ADJOURNED