- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:21:07 +0200
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <feigenbl@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:17:52AM -0400, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Andy Seaborne wrote on 10/20/2006 09:18:02 AM: > > > > > This message is an outline for an operational definition of the > > SPARQL algebra. > > > > There is advocacy for this change in the working group; this message is > to > > check that with everyone; to get early feedback, and to check we > areagreed on > > what it means. The style of approach isn't new - Fred's work embodies > this > > style as does the Chilean paper. > > On my initial examination, everything here agrees with my recent thoughts > and understanding, and I'd be happy with it. I think we should name the > operators the same as the keywords wherever we can (so LeftJoin -> > Optional, but Join can stay). > > Lee +1 to these definitions and for Lee's naming suggestion. -- -eric home-office: +1.617.395.1213 (usually 900-2300 CET) +33.1.45.35.62.14 cell: +33.6.73.84.87.26 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2006 11:20:09 UTC