Fred, The design message I metioned was: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0145 An explicit assigment might be the best long term approach if it is also available in the main part of the query, otherwise a syntax that is specific to the SELECT clause seems more appropriate. To be compatible with the results format as it stands, there needs to be a variable name - that could change to a more general label - but just positional does not work because the XML results format omits unbound variables, not record them explicitly. - - - - - - What was the issue for SQL with ambiguity that you worked on? Was it syntactic ambiguity or an interpretion/associativity ambiguity? AndyReceived on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:45:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:42 GMT