Re: status of comment "Paradoxical SPARQL query" [was: A question]

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 14:21 +0100, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> In trying to figure out issues with the algebra, I ended up looking at:
> 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006May/ 
> 0009.html
> 
> and wondering if the group thinks it dealt with this point.

I don't think so. I thought perhaps this got lost in the transition
from me to Kendall, but Kendall ack'd it 7Jun...
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jun/0012

There's a sketch of a test case in there. EricP, I'd appreciate it
if you'd flesh it out a bit and check it in.

>  If so,  
> could I get a pointer to the resolution?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E