- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:06:23 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Telecon 3 Oct:
"""
<bijan> AndyS, when I was reading rq24 I noticed that it seems like there has
been introduced in a lot of the definition a sort of functional syntax for the
algebraic operations. Is this right? Is it systmatic?
"""
Not sure what you are referring to - trying to follow this up a day later,
I've lost the context a bit. Could you pick an example from the doc? I
haven't introduced ("added new stuff") any new material into definitions
except where the WG has made changes. Or did you mean "introduce" as in "uses".
There is opt(A,B) in optionals - that has been there a while. There is the
use of S() because S is a function in a few place.
It might be an idea to have more explicit functional definitions for the
algebra. What do you (or anyone else) think?
Andy
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 10:06:58 UTC