W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Telecon follow-up

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:06:23 +0100
Message-ID: <4523879F.8080108@hp.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

Telecon 3 Oct:
<bijan> AndyS, when I was reading rq24 I noticed that it seems like there has 
been introduced in a lot of the definition a sort of functional syntax for the 
algebraic operations. Is this right? Is it systmatic?

Not sure what you are referring to - trying to follow this up a day later, 
I've lost the context a bit.  Could you pick an example from the doc?  I 
haven't introduced ("added new stuff") any new material into definitions 
except where the WG has made changes.  Or did you mean "introduce" as in "uses".

There is opt(A,B) in optionals - that has been there a while.  There is the 
use of S() because S is a function in a few place.

It might be an idea to have more explicit functional definitions for the 
algebra.  What do you (or anyone else) think?

Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 10:06:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:52 UTC