W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: agenda, 3 Oct, 14:30 UTC - regrets

From: Fred Zemke <fred.zemke@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:57:45 -0700
Message-ID: <4521D1A9.5020505@oracle.com>
CC: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

regrets -- feeling sick.  Fred

Kendall Clark wrote:

>
> (Yes, I know it's too long to get to it all, but we're getting close  
> to the point where, if we're going to finish this caledary year, I  
> have to start putting questions more often and w/ less time for  
> discussion, so consider the new, longer agenda style a preview of  
> what's coming next. If you care about these issues, speak up now and  
> attend telecons!)
>
> 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 3 October, 2006  
> at 14:30:00 UTC
>        + Comments on the agenda?
>        + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>        + ?? to scribe
>             - supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>        + roll call
>        + TODO: Approve 19 Sept minutes, when they appear
>        + next meeting 10 Oct, recruit scribe
>
> 1. Action Items (waiting for minutes from last meeting)
>
> 2. Quick update on publication mechanics for rq24 & json-sparql
>
> 3. Term distinctness for literals
>
> Some proposals for closing this one out:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0267.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0269.html
>
> *I intend to put a question hereabouts during the 10 Oct meeting*
>
> 4. unbound variables in FILTER
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0206.html
>
> And LeeF's test cases (2nd edition):
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0243.html
>
> There seems to be a glimmer of consensus around this issue. I'd like to
> confirm or disconfirm that during this telecon.
>
> 5. Open world and other value tests
>
> We need an update on:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0180.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0169.html
>
> 6. Is there an issue with NAF & !BOUND?
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0214.html
>
> 7. SolutionModifier
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0263.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0268.html
>
> 8. entailment & general framework
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0264.html
>
> 9. duplicates from  UNION
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0265.html
>
> But note:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Sep/ 
> 0011.html
>
> 10. Domain of solutions underspecified
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0266.html
>
> 11. Protocol spec:
>
> a. WSDL guys want schemaLocation added; or we could remove it completely
> b. LeeF points out some non-TR links
> c. Why can't you POST sparql syntax?
> (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
> 2006Sep/0008.html)
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> [2] <forthcoming??>
> [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
> [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2006 02:59:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT