W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

agenda, 3 Oct, 14:30 UTC

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 10:56:23 -0400
Message-Id: <CE673607-3792-484E-9AAC-233F47B84ADF@monkeyfist.com>
To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

(Yes, I know it's too long to get to it all, but we're getting close  
to the point where, if we're going to finish this caledary year, I  
have to start putting questions more often and w/ less time for  
discussion, so consider the new, longer agenda style a preview of  
what's coming next. If you care about these issues, speak up now and  
attend telecons!)

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 3 October, 2006  
at 14:30:00 UTC
        + Comments on the agenda?
        + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
        + ?? to scribe
             - supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
        + roll call
        + TODO: Approve 19 Sept minutes, when they appear
        + next meeting 10 Oct, recruit scribe

1. Action Items (waiting for minutes from last meeting)

2. Quick update on publication mechanics for rq24 & json-sparql

3. Term distinctness for literals

Some proposals for closing this one out:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0267.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0269.html

*I intend to put a question hereabouts during the 10 Oct meeting*

4. unbound variables in FILTER

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0206.html

And LeeF's test cases (2nd edition):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0243.html

There seems to be a glimmer of consensus around this issue. I'd like to
confirm or disconfirm that during this telecon.

5. Open world and other value tests

We need an update on:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0180.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0169.html

6. Is there an issue with NAF & !BOUND?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0214.html

7. SolutionModifier

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0263.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0268.html

8. entailment & general framework

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0264.html

9. duplicates from  UNION

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0265.html

But note:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Sep/ 
0011.html

10. Domain of solutions underspecified

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JulSep/0266.html

11. Protocol spec:

a. WSDL guys want schemaLocation added; or we could remove it completely
b. LeeF points out some non-TR links
c. Why can't you POST sparql syntax?
(See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
2006Sep/0008.html)

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] <forthcoming??>
[3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
[4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 15:03:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT