Re: Go ahead with pub

On Oct 2, 2006, at 6:06 AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

>> I would like that to be deleted because it's confusing on several   
>> levels (e.g., why doesn't it apply in optional?) I don't  
>> particularly  care that it'd done before pub, but it seems an easy  
>> enough move. I  mean, it doesn't *change* anything!
>
> This text does seem out of date: the objection from DaveB was  
> withdrawn and I can't find a record of any other (I just checked  
> with Steve).
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#disjunction
>
> It is confusing.  But I'd like the chair's permission as confirmation.

It's on *my* list of document warts, so, yes, please remove it.

Cheers,
Kendall