W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: Go ahead with pub

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:48:54 +0100
Message-Id: <200B7BA4-2663-4CF1-BAD3-D87E3E8E6228@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com

Hmm. I had a few better queries (and gave up on Google; for some  
reason google horribly sucks at querying the W3C mail archives; mebbe  
need to filter the scope to the w3c site):
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0271

Some stuff around here:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0221

Also, it's important that scoping set dorking is not sufficient as seen:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/ 
0195.html
(i.e., you have to constraint the queries to, e.g., avoid variables  
in certain positions and patterns)

Hmm. this might be closer:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/ 
0190.html

And here, but it's just a clue:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/ 
0198.html

"""If we say that bindings must be to terms in some restricted set, and
don't allow that set to have too many bnodeIDs in it, then ?x might
fail to have a binding when _:x was true, according to Sergio. This
is the argument that he used against the proposal to treat pattern
bnodes as blank variables."""

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0210.html

"""Sergio pointed out that SELECT doesn't necessarily indicate
distinguishedness. That is, on some folks understanding, *ALL* query
variables are distinguished all the time, but only sometimes projected
(which is what the listing of vars in the SELECT clause means on this
reading)."""

Aha!
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0301

Though the text seems a little buggy in places (e.g., the example)

This is the closest I get for now. If someone else wants to search  
further from here, then yay.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Monday, 2 October 2006 11:58:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT