W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: ISSUE: rule [14] SolutionModifier

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:30:45 +0100
Message-ID: <4517AFD5.4090906@hp.com>
To: Fred Zemke <fred.zemke@oracle.com>
CC: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>



Fred Zemke wrote:
> SolutionModifier consists of three optional parts:
> 
> [14] SolutionModifier ::= OrderClause? LimitClause? OffsetClause?
> 
> Section 10.1 "Solution sequences and result forms"
> says that OffsetClause is processed before LimitClause.
> Therefore it would seem more natural to rearrange this rule like this:
> 
> [14] SolutionModifier ::= OrderClause? OffsetClause? LimitClause?
> 
> Fred

This continues the thread from
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0116
to
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0154

SQL has the order as currently in SPARQL.  We could allow both orders; limit 
and offset go together.

[14]  SolutionModifier ::= OrderClause? OffsetLimitClause?
[14a] OffsetLimitClause ::= (LIMIT (OFFSET)?) | (OFFSET (LIMIT)?)

	Andy
Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 10:31:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:27 GMT