W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: [EDITORIAL] Preface of rq24

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:53:05 -0400
Message-Id: <AC9CB33C-6C1D-48B0-AA89-80D1C12980CC@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:26 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq24.html
> I would prefer that:
> 	Should DISTINCT be based on lean graphs?
> Be phrased as
> 	What is the definition of DISTINCT?

I agree with this suggestion to the editors.

> 	Should SPARQL care about graphs that are inconsistent by D- 
> entailment?
> as:
> 	What are the answers of a query of a D-inconsistent graph?

And with this one too.

> Finally, I would prefer a different phrasing for:
> 	"""Many of these issues reduce to "Is SPARQL a graph query  
> language or a higher level query language?" """"

I *really* dislike this current phrasing; it's far too tendentious to  
be useful. What is a "higher level query language" anyway?

> But without specifying which issues do so and how, I think it's  
> more confusing than helpful.


Received on Sunday, 17 September 2006 22:52:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:51 UTC