- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:31:48 +0200
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 8 Aug 2006, at 15:31, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > I can only find this as: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ > 2006Jun/0052 yeah, it is the same example. > The first thing is to decide what the desirable right answer should > be. > > S(?q = <a>) seems desirable from a user's perspective. It is desirable since this is the way implementations work (subgraph matching): this was for me the prerequisite in finding a semantics - i.e., it should reflect what implementors have done. That's why I would propose to change the semantics while keeping the prerequisite that the implementation should be based on subgraph matching. --e.
Received on Tuesday, 8 August 2006 14:32:10 UTC