W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: Blank node identifiers in FILTER clauses

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:20:09 +0100
Message-Id: <20D85F50-E164-424B-A09A-D5A32B2331D7@garlik.com>
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 2 Jul 2006, at 11:39, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> I am betting (significant amounts of my time) that the parallelism
> (and cut-and-paste-ism) with a popularly deployed assertion language
> is worth the extra bit parser effort (keeping an association list of
> bNode symbol to bNode). It is possible, however, that I am missing
> some of Jeen's pain because I didn't fully implement something or
> because he is working in a different context than I imagine.

The scope is somewhat annoying to deal with. Depending on what the  
current position on scope is, I lost track.

- Steve
Received on Sunday, 2 July 2006 11:20:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:26 GMT