Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite)

On Mar 29, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> That version had the dates right, but used the undated URIs
> and said "Working Draft". Somebody noticed in preparation
> for the meeting with The Director.
>
> Since the bibliography generator works fine for me, I pasted
> the results in and checked it in.

Thanks a lot -- to be honest, I was never entirely sure *how* those  
entries should be formated. Nothing in my Chicago Manual of Style  
about W3C. :>

Cheers,
Kendall