W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 28 Mar

From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 02:45:34 +0200
To: connolly@w3.org
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <E1FO2Lk-0008S7-38@maggie.w3.org>

regrets
--e.

------- Original message -------
From: Dan Connolly  <connolly@w3.org>
Sent: 27/3,  14:48

> 
> hypetext: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/weekly-agenda
> 
> plain text:
> 
>     1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-03-28T14:30Z
>        ([2]local times)
>           + Comments on the agenda? sorry it's late, again.
>           + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>           + scribe: KendallC
>                o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>                  ([5]log to appear)
>           + roll call
>           + PROPOSED: to ammend [6]Meeting minutes: March 21st, 2006 to
>             show DanC's action re "underspecified errors" withdrawn and
>             approve it as ammended
>           + PROPOSED: to meet again Tue, 4 Apr 2006, 14:30Z (Boston Tue
>             10:30 AM; Los Angeles Tue 7:30 AM; London Tue 3:30 PM;
>             [7]other local times); recruit scribe; confirm chair
>     2. comments related to [8]rdfSemantics, [9]owlDisjunction
>           + ACTION LeeF: to find email thread about wording of
>             restricting pattern solution domain to variables in BGP;
>             follow up on that to get text back into rq23
>           + ACTION: LeeF to create test case resulting from
>             2006-03-03T11:15Z (before lunch, 2nd day) whiteboard
>             discussion
>           + ACTION: SergioT to respond to [10]2005-09-18T15:02:48Z
>             Peter F. Patel-Schneider (overtaken by more recent last
>             call?)
>     3. Issue nameValueForms. PROPOSED: to postpone.
>     4. protocol editing, WSDL 2 coordination
>           + ACTION: KC to update protocol references to [SRD] and WSDL.
>             done in 1.115, but there are new WSDL drafts now...
>           + ACTION: LeeF to try SPARQL WSDL files with Woden validator,
>             report results. [11]done
>           + ACTION: KendallC to confirm that SPARQL WSDL
>             query/queryrequest and maxOccurs do not need to be changed,
>             despite [12]Marsh's comment of 17Feb. Done, I think.
>     5. Toward CR
>           + ACTION: SvenG to follow up with Reto Krummenacher on
>             [2006-02-24T16:40:55Z Reto Krummenacher]. Note: the thread
>             is closed as of [13]14 March
>           + ACTION: DanC to send [OK?] msg to 2006-02-22T23:56:54Z
>             Peter F. Patel-Schneider on Section 1 and Section 2,
>             basically, [needstest] [14]done; note reply PFPS,
>             [15]nearby comment from Enrico
>           + [16]lc comment status: as of v1.71: 9+1 closed (scripts
>             missed one), 4-1 pending, and 1 open that is late. note:
>             [17]status of 1st last call, archived 20 Mar, with 56
>             closed, 63 pending, and 21 open (Horrocks, Patel-Schneider,
>             ter Horst, Patel-Schneider, Baker, Zemke/Oracle)
>           + ACTION: DanC to draft request for CR progress: [18]CR
>             request. Done.
>        PROPOSED: to advance SPARQL to CR as discussed 21 Mar i.e. plan
>        to go to CR on 29-March-2006, contingent on successful outcomes
>        of actions in that meeting. See [19]ballot results
>     6. JSON results format
>           + ACTION: Elias When finialized, email the WG for review as
>             possible WG Note. [20]done. Review offered by: AndyS,
>             Sergio, Steve
>     7. test suite maintenance
>           + ACTION: EricP to work on [2006-02-24T08:45:23Z Olivier
> [            Corby], potentially automating examples2tests [21]progress,
>             [22]done. anybody able to reproduce EricP's work?
>           + ACTION: AndyS conjure some LIMIT/OFFSET tests. [23]progress
>             22March
>           + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
>             op:dateTime triple
>        See also [24]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [25]REQUEST
>        FOR TESTCASE in WG threads
>     8. MIME type registrations
>           + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([26]2Mar)
>     9. UC&R end-game.
>        We didn't do a last call review, so it's not in order to request
>        CR for it. Let's make it a NOTE, shall we?
> 
>       [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
>       [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=28&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
>       [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
>       [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>       [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-dawg-irc
>       [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0465.html
>       [7] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=4&day=4&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
>       [8] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#rdfSemantics
>       [9] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#owlDisjunction
>      [10] http://www.w3.org/mid/20050918.110248.43269866.pfps@research.bell-labs.com
>      [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0475.html
>      [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Feb/0009.html
>      [13] http://www.w3.org/mid/4416F59B.4090307@deri.org
>      [14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0053.html
>      [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Mar/0062.html
>      [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/lc-status-report.html
>      [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2006Mar/att-0022/lc-status-report.html__charset_us-ascii
>      [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349
>      [19] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/crq349/results
>      [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0477.html
>      [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0452.html
>      [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0476.html
>      [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0472.html
>      [24] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search
>      [25] http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-i
ndex=public-rdf-dawg
>      [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues
> 
> -- 
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 00:46:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT