W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: 1.115 of sparql protocol editor's draft (WSDL2 cite)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:09:42 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143493782.12963.769.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 15:57 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > I note they just updated their CR today. I'm inclined to cite the
> > new one:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327
> 
> I cited the /TR/wsdl20 version (and same for adjuncts & primer)...
>
> But now I (may?) have to redo all the real work I did on Friday,  
> going through with a fine-tooth comb to make sure they didn't break  
> anything we use in the changes.

Hmm... if there were any changes that really break our stuff,
we have some argument that they should have gone back to Last Call,
not just updated their CR draft.

So thanks for the work with the fine-tooth comb... if you're
inspired to do more, great; but if not, I can live with that too.

> But at least the validator still loves us (as of Friday)...

That's the justification I gave to the Director for considering
this dependency discharged. It has passed at least one level
of internal review...

> > The TR bib generator will give you the full citation...
> >   http://www.w3.org/2002/01/tr-automation/tr-biblio-ui
> 
> Wasn't working at all just now.

Odd... I tested it before I sent my message. Oh well.

>  Did it by hand in 1.117.

Indeed, thanks.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/#ref
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/#chlog

> Cheers,
> Kendall
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 21:09:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT