Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone?

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

>
> There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts
> with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. I think
> it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came
> up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times
> that I was convinced to add a WG issue.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#nameValueForms
>
> I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody
> (including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it.
>
> Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it?

Seconded. (FWIW, I probably would have voted against including it on  
our issues list, but apparently that's at the chair's discretion.)

Cheers,
Kendall