W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: nameValueForms: ok to postpone?

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:43:28 -0500
Message-Id: <EE13E82F-6C84-4DF9-88C5-FF0ECFE5D52B@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:49 PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts
> with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. I think
> it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came
> up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times
> that I was convinced to add a WG issue.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#nameValueForms
> I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody
> (including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it.
> Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it?

Seconded. (FWIW, I probably would have voted against including it on  
our issues list, but apparently that's at the chair's discretion.)

Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 20:44:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC