W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

nameValueForms: ok to postpone?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:49:57 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143488997.12963.740.camel@dirk.w3.org>

There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts
with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. I think
it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came
up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times
that I was convinced to add a WG issue.


I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody
(including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it.

Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it?
Does anybody want to argue to do other than postpone it?

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 19:50:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:00:50 UTC