There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. I think it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times that I was convinced to add a WG issue. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#nameValueForms I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody (including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it. Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it? Does anybody want to argue to do other than postpone it? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 27 March 2006 19:50:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:40 GMT