W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

nameValueForms: ok to postpone?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:49:57 -0600
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143488997.12963.740.camel@dirk.w3.org>

There have been some discussion of how SPARQL interacts
with the ?name=value HTML form syntax/protocol. I think
it's an interesting design space to noodle on; it came
up in a public comment and I bumped into it enough times
that I was convinced to add a WG issue.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#nameValueForms

I have chatted with a few of you about it; everybody
(including the original commentor) is OK to postpone it.

Does anybody 2nd this proposal to postpone it?
Does anybody want to argue to do other than postpone it?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 19:50:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT