W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Protocol document: uri -> iri

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:21:59 -0600
To: "souripriya.das@oracle.com" <souripriya.das@oracle.com>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143422519.12963.670.camel@dirk.w3.org> 

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 18:41 -0500, souripriya.das@oracle.com wrote:
> Not sure if we need default-graph-iri and named-graph-iri parameters.

The working group is resolved that we do not.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
closed again in 2006-01-12

Do you have new information that suggests we should reconsider?

> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> 
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 01:25:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 October 2009 14:42:05 GMT