W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Lost in the shuffle? (Re: PROPOSED: that SPARQL advance to CR)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:16:57 -0600
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1143422217.12963.667.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 18:13 -0500, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> The other nice bit would be if there were nice anchors for the 
> definitions, e.g, #def1

Do they not already have nice anchors?

at least some do:
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_RDFTerm
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#defn_QueryVariable

And I wonder... why would "definition 15" be better
than "Definition: RDF Term"?

I agree it's editorial, and if you can work with the editors
to get it in, very well.

But I don't see that much motivation
for it, and it'll take some effort to maintain over time.

> I could add both these things in, if that would get these in :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 27 March 2006 01:17:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:25 GMT